Ancient Alien Theory — Modern Myth-Making and Eurocentrism
Episode 2 of Zero Barriers gives me an opportunity to comment on a resurgence of interest in Ancient Alien Theory, how it intersects with academic pursuits in our greater Human history, and how this relates to the philosophy of Zensunni Bardo. Please, let me know what you think in the comments!
Transcript
Welcome back to another episode of Zero Barriers, where we dissect, discuss, and dismantle the systemic biases that permeate our society. Today, we're diving deep into the murky waters of Ancient Alien Theory (AAT), a topic that has captivated the public imagination for decades. But before we get into it, let's remember one of the pillars of the Zensunni Bardo Path: Answers exist all around us; we simply need to find the proper Questions to unlock them.
Before we dive into today's topic, let's clear the air a bit. Now, I haven't been flooded with emails or anything, but a few folks have wondered why I'm shifting gears from art and advocacy to, well, ancient civilizations and the like. Here's the thing: being a creative soul means you find inspiration in all sorts of places. For me, that includes everything from archaeology to ancient history and prehistory. It's not just a passing interest; it's a lifelong passion that's as much a part of me as my art. And guess what? It all ties back to the Zensunni Bardo Path. So, as we go along, I invite you to keep an open mind. Challenge your own ideas and maybe, just maybe, we'll all learn something new.
Ancient Alien Theory has been around for at least a century, and it's evolved over time to include various elements from different cultures and mythologies. But what's the allure? Why do people gravitate towards this theory? Well, it offers an alternative narrative to traditional religious and historical accounts, replacing the "angry God" of Abrahamic traditions with extraterrestrial beings. It's modern myth-making at its finest.
Zacharia Sitchin, a key figure in AAT, popularised the idea that the Sumerian civilization was influenced by extraterrestrial beings called the Annunaki. However, Sitchin's translations have been widely criticised for their inaccuracies. For instance, the term "Annunaki" is more accurately translated as "princely heirs", not "those who from Heaven came." This mistranslation alone dismantles the foundation upon which much of AAT is built.
“But Why Does This Matter?”, you ask.
Well, AAT presents specific dangers to objective academic pursuits. Here are some point-for-point examples of how academia and AAT interpret similar elements in vastly different ways:
The Great Pyramids:
**Academia**: Built by ancient Egyptians as tombs for pharaohs, using a workforce of skilled labourers.
**AAT**: Constructed by aliens or with alien technology, as humans couldn't possibly have built such structures.
Sumerian Texts:
**Academia**: Interpret the Annunaki as possibly mythological figures or high-ranking individuals within the society.
**AAT**: Asserts the Annunaki are extraterrestrial beings who came to Earth to mine gold.
Göbekli Tepe, Turkey:
**Academia**: An archaeological site that challenges our understanding of prehistoric societies and their capabilities.
**AAT**: Completely ignores because it doesn't fit the narrative of aliens kickstarting civilization.
Ancient Art and Carvings:
**Academia**: Views them as symbolic or ritualistic representations.
**AAT**: Claims they are depictions of ancient astronauts and advanced technology.
DNA and Genetic Studies:
**Academia**: Uses these to trace human migration patterns and evolutionary changes.
**AAT**: Asserts that human DNA was manipulated by aliens to create modern humans.
It's a feel-good narrative that offers palatable alternate histories, but at the cost of sidelining native and indigenous perspectives. The theory also has a knack for replacing traditional religious figures with aliens, essentially creating a modern mythology.
Allowing AAT to continue unchallenged is a disservice to objective academic pursuits. It lacks internal rigour and is resistant to external critique. Moreover, it propagates the erasure of indigenous knowledge, further marginalising already marginalised communities.
In closing, I want to bring us back to one of the pillars of the Zensunni Bardo Path, which is that the Answer precedes the Question. In the context of Ancient Alien Theory and mainstream academia, this means that we should treat every discovery, every artefact, and every piece of ancient text as an Answer waiting for the right Question. Instead of forcing these discoveries into our preconceived narratives or using them to uphold systemic biases, let's ask new, better Questions. Let's be open to the multitude of stories and histories that exist, and let's give them the respect and rigorous inquiry they deserve. Because the moment we think we have all the answers, we stop asking the right questions.
Coming: Next
In our next episode, we're going to connect the dots between Homo Naledi, Sumeria, and the broader philosophy of the Zensunni Bardo Path. We've explored the pitfalls of mainstream academia and the allure of Ancient Alien Theory, but how do these narratives intersect with our ongoing journey to dismantle systemic biases? We'll delve into the untold stories and the voices that have been silenced, all while asking the Questions that lead us to new Answers. So, buckle up as we continue to challenge the status quo and uncover the hidden layers of our shared history. You won't want to miss this!
